<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dot Travel - The rise and fall of a brilliant concept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: demonimoux</title>
		<link>http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-98226</link>
		<dc:creator>demonimoux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-98226</guid>
		<description>Hello

Nice site. I just added it to favorites :)

Thanks and see ya
&lt;a href="http://www.szczecin-hotele.skybit.pl" rel="nofollow"&gt;Szczecin hotel&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p>
<p>Nice site. I just added it to favorites <img src='http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks and see ya<br />
<a href="http://www.szczecin-hotele.skybit.pl" rel="nofollow">Szczecin hotel</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveCahonne</title>
		<link>http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-79792</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveCahonne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-79792</guid>
		<description>Never underestimate the power of the internet. An increasing number of people use the internet
to search for a business or service so having a web presence is an important media for promoting
your company. Web design is a real skill and if your website is to not only look good but work well,
it should be constructed by a professional web designer.

If you are interested, you can contact me: hqwebdesign (AT) gmail (DOT) com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never underestimate the power of the internet. An increasing number of people use the internet<br />
to search for a business or service so having a web presence is an important media for promoting<br />
your company. Web design is a real skill and if your website is to not only look good but work well,<br />
it should be constructed by a professional web designer.</p>
<p>If you are interested, you can contact me: hqwebdesign (AT) gmail (DOT) com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Lyons</title>
		<link>http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-65225</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Lyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 02:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-65225</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;We registered our dot travel domain name, however, this has yielded absolutely nothing to increase traffic, OR our bottom line.&lt;/b&gt;

Aside from the high annual registration price irritant, our listing from "Search dot travel" - which contains a hyperlink to our primary site - does not appear to have ever been harvested / indexed by Google.

Precious dollars NOT well spent.  I do not believe that "dot travel" has a strong or viable enough foothold to justify the cost.  If, however, the annual cost were to come down to one tenth of the current price, then perhaps we will reconsider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>We registered our dot travel domain name, however, this has yielded absolutely nothing to increase traffic, OR our bottom line.</b></p>
<p>Aside from the high annual registration price irritant, our listing from &#8220;Search dot travel&#8221; - which contains a hyperlink to our primary site - does not appear to have ever been harvested / indexed by Google.</p>
<p>Precious dollars NOT well spent.  I do not believe that &#8220;dot travel&#8221; has a strong or viable enough foothold to justify the cost.  If, however, the annual cost were to come down to one tenth of the current price, then perhaps we will reconsider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Trawley</title>
		<link>http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-9826</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Trawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-9826</guid>
		<description>The dot.travel was not really a bad idea, but I think that the concept had it coming. For one thing, traveling has always being about the physical nature, and even if you use dot.travel for nothing more then looking up tips, I think a social network like www.trekcafe.com would be better...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dot.travel was not really a bad idea, but I think that the concept had it coming. For one thing, traveling has always being about the physical nature, and even if you use dot.travel for nothing more then looking up tips, I think a social network like <a href="http://www.trekcafe.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.trekcafe.com</a> would be better&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff L</title>
		<link>http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-9404</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 03:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-9404</guid>
		<description>Withe scarcity of good domains names out there in the .com,.ca, .net, etc world, there may yet be another day for .travel. 

I think much of the blame has to lie at the feet of the poor adoption among destination marketers, but indeed it would be sad if all these names just end up being adsense sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Withe scarcity of good domains names out there in the .com,.ca, .net, etc world, there may yet be another day for .travel. </p>
<p>I think much of the blame has to lie at the feet of the poor adoption among destination marketers, but indeed it would be sad if all these names just end up being adsense sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meilee</title>
		<link>http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-8727</link>
		<dc:creator>Meilee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-8727</guid>
		<description>Well said - what a great entry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said - what a great entry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hughes</title>
		<link>http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-1558</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-1558</guid>
		<description>Further to your posts above - I received yet another call from a dot travel representative (not a domain registrar sales person) last week asking if they could assist in locating MORE dot travel domains for us, based on our products and services.  They are obviously being very aggressive in unloading these.

My concern is still the high price for these domains - they are very costly relative to other common domains. Will the price come down now that the authentication process has been removed?  Price certainly contributed to the slow adoption?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to your posts above - I received yet another call from a dot travel representative (not a domain registrar sales person) last week asking if they could assist in locating MORE dot travel domains for us, based on our products and services.  They are obviously being very aggressive in unloading these.</p>
<p>My concern is still the high price for these domains - they are very costly relative to other common domains. Will the price come down now that the authentication process has been removed?  Price certainly contributed to the slow adoption?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-1459</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-1459</guid>
		<description>Put simply, .travel is an answer to a question no one really asked.   

You can't blame consumers, the travel industry, tourism organizations, etc. for not adopting a product that they really didn't want or need to begin with.  I would argue that your premise that it was a great concept to begin with is false in the sense that there really isn't a viable market for .travel domains.  The market that Tralliance perceived was there - wasn't interested (which is now obvious), therefore the execution was doomed from the beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put simply, .travel is an answer to a question no one really asked.   </p>
<p>You can&#8217;t blame consumers, the travel industry, tourism organizations, etc. for not adopting a product that they really didn&#8217;t want or need to begin with.  I would argue that your premise that it was a great concept to begin with is false in the sense that there really isn&#8217;t a viable market for .travel domains.  The market that Tralliance perceived was there - wasn&#8217;t interested (which is now obvious), therefore the execution was doomed from the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Siefkas-Cassemiro</title>
		<link>http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Siefkas-Cassemiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-951</guid>
		<description>As a representative of Tralliance Corporation, I wanted to personally clarify how this affects the future of the .travel domain.

The intended sale will not result in changes to management, policies, or to Tralliance's relationship with the TTPC.  We will continue to manage and promote the .travel domain name.  Under the new structure, Tralliance will operate more efficiently and cost savings generated from the transaction will allow us to allocate more dollars to the promotion of the domain.

You can already see some of the shift.  We are making ourselves available to the industry by becoming active participants at assocation meetings and trade shows.  Some of our up and coming events are TIA's NCSTD meeting at the end of February as well as ITB and Le Map Monde in March.  

Heidi Siefkas-Cassemiro
Tralliance Corporation, the .travel Registry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a representative of Tralliance Corporation, I wanted to personally clarify how this affects the future of the .travel domain.</p>
<p>The intended sale will not result in changes to management, policies, or to Tralliance&#8217;s relationship with the TTPC.  We will continue to manage and promote the .travel domain name.  Under the new structure, Tralliance will operate more efficiently and cost savings generated from the transaction will allow us to allocate more dollars to the promotion of the domain.</p>
<p>You can already see some of the shift.  We are making ourselves available to the industry by becoming active participants at assocation meetings and trade shows.  Some of our up and coming events are TIA&#8217;s NCSTD meeting at the end of February as well as ITB and Le Map Monde in March.  </p>
<p>Heidi Siefkas-Cassemiro<br />
Tralliance Corporation, the .travel Registry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens Thraenhart</title>
		<link>http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens Thraenhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tourisminternetmarketing.com/featured/dot-travel-the-rise-and-fall-of-a-brilliant-concept/#comment-897</guid>
		<description>And the saga continues...please read an article from Travel Weekly:


Tralliance is sold; dot-travel domain now privately held

February 11, 2008

By Dan Luzadder

Tralliance, the company that controls the dot-travel domain, has been taken private, removing its finances and activities from the scrutiny of public markets.

Until now, Tralliance, the official registry of dot-travel addresses, has been a publicly traded subsidiary of TheGlobe.com, which in turn is publicly traded over the counter.

On Feb. 1, TheGlobe.com announced that it had sold Tralliance to the Registry Management Co., a privately held enterprise.

However, the sale did not change the ultimate ownership or control of the company by travel industry entrepreneur Mike Egan, owner and chairman of TheGlobe.com, and his financial partner, Ed Cespedes, the president of Tralliance, who together own RMC. 

"We're doing this for efficiency reasons," Cespedes said of the sale. "Let's face it: It costs a lot of money to keep Tralliance as a public company. It's money that could be spent in promoting the dot-travel domain instead."

The sale came close on the heels of significant policy changes at the start of the year that company executives said would allow them to turn the travel-oriented domain from a little-used online marketplace into a major player in the industry.

That process began last fall when Tralliance fired dot-travel's founder, president and promoter, Ron Andruff, and announced that it would treat the dot-travel domain as a for-profit business, rather than as a service to the travel industry. Andruff, who remains a stockholder and who tried unsuccessfully after his dismissal to buy Tralliance, declined to comment last week.

Bill Maloney, executive vice president of ASTA and a former member of the Travel Partnership Corp., dot-travel's advisory board, said he was unaware of the sale but added that taking Tralliance private raised some questions in his mind.

"What the industry loses, of course, is transparency," Maloney said.

The sale also closely follows a decision last month by Tralliance to initiate so-called bulk sales of dot-travel domain names at discount prices. Under the new sales plan, Cespedes said, anyone buying 25,000 or more names will get a rebate.

But so far, just one such sale has been acknowledged by the company: the purchase of 200,000 destination and service-oriented domain names by Egan and Cespedes themselves.

Cespedes confirmed last week that he and Egan had created a new enterprise named LabiGroup, which in turn acquired 200,000 names to help build working destinations. The dot-travel top-level domain has struggled to find buyers willing to actually build dot-travel Web sites and use them for travel-related businesses. Until the LabiGroup purchase, only about 30,000 names had been sold, and most of them have not been used.

"Rather than keep talking about it, we said, 'We'll put a bulk purchase program in place and talk to guys who will commit money, real money, to dot-travel,' " Cespedes said. "So we are leading by example. We are putting up sites around destinations, around services and around things that we believe people are interested in concerning travel, so that when the millions of people who type in dot-travel every month -- some 8 to 10 million are doing so -- they will find something they're looking for."

Cespedes would not disclose how much LabiGroup paid for those 200,000 names, but even when allowing for pricing discounts, the purchase would have required an estimated $2 million investment. 

The sales agreement values Tralliance at $7.3 million.

Benefits to new ownership

Cespedes told Travel Weekly that the new ownership would be invisible to buyers and owners of dot-travel domain names. He said it would reduce fixed costs for Tralliance as it redoubles efforts to raise the profile of the struggling domain-name business and boosts participation in dot-travel within the global travel industry.

Cespedes said the sale would not bring changes to management, policies or to Tralliance's relationship to TTPC, which was established when the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, better known as ICANN, approved the domain three years ago.

Because TheGlobe.com is publicly traded, Cespedes said he could not comment on details of the transaction beyond what was revealed in the public announcement. But he said TheGlobe.com would offer more details in a regulatory filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission this week.

Terms of the transaction that have been disclosed call for Egan and business affiliates that have invested in Tralliance, primarily other Egan-controlled entities, to waive their interest in convertible promissory notes worth about $4.7 million as well as other fees and debt totaling about $6 million.

An earn-out provision, based on the performance of Tralliance after the sale, could add another $1.3 million to the deal. TheGlobe also will issue 269 million shares of common stock to the Registry Management Co., the company noted.

Cespedes said that under new policies recently approved by TTPC, he and Egan, like other purchasers of dot-travel domain names, have 60 days following the purchase of a dot-travel domain name to open a working Web site for each name.

He said LabiGroup had used a computer program to pick potential names and had then eyeballed each name (e.g. Mississippi.travel, SpringBreak.travel and SpringBreakHotel.travel) to ensure that they were not too long, made sense and were likely to attract travel shoppers.

Meeting the deadline for getting Web sites up and running for each of those 200,000 domain names presents a significant challenge, Cespedes said.

"It's not only a lot to do but exceptionally expensive," he said. "We have to build the sites. That takes time and more money. It is a big risk and a big investment, but we're willing to make it, as we always have been."

In the end, Cespedes said, there is still a lot of room for bulk and individual sales.

Cespedes said Tralliance was planning a marketing campaign later this year that would include magazine and television advertising.

He said the company had also hired a public relations expert to help raise the profile of the dot-travel domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the saga continues&#8230;please read an article from Travel Weekly:</p>
<p>Tralliance is sold; dot-travel domain now privately held</p>
<p>February 11, 2008</p>
<p>By Dan Luzadder</p>
<p>Tralliance, the company that controls the dot-travel domain, has been taken private, removing its finances and activities from the scrutiny of public markets.</p>
<p>Until now, Tralliance, the official registry of dot-travel addresses, has been a publicly traded subsidiary of TheGlobe.com, which in turn is publicly traded over the counter.</p>
<p>On Feb. 1, TheGlobe.com announced that it had sold Tralliance to the Registry Management Co., a privately held enterprise.</p>
<p>However, the sale did not change the ultimate ownership or control of the company by travel industry entrepreneur Mike Egan, owner and chairman of TheGlobe.com, and his financial partner, Ed Cespedes, the president of Tralliance, who together own RMC. </p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re doing this for efficiency reasons,&#8221; Cespedes said of the sale. &#8220;Let&#8217;s face it: It costs a lot of money to keep Tralliance as a public company. It&#8217;s money that could be spent in promoting the dot-travel domain instead.&#8221;</p>
<p>The sale came close on the heels of significant policy changes at the start of the year that company executives said would allow them to turn the travel-oriented domain from a little-used online marketplace into a major player in the industry.</p>
<p>That process began last fall when Tralliance fired dot-travel&#8217;s founder, president and promoter, Ron Andruff, and announced that it would treat the dot-travel domain as a for-profit business, rather than as a service to the travel industry. Andruff, who remains a stockholder and who tried unsuccessfully after his dismissal to buy Tralliance, declined to comment last week.</p>
<p>Bill Maloney, executive vice president of ASTA and a former member of the Travel Partnership Corp., dot-travel&#8217;s advisory board, said he was unaware of the sale but added that taking Tralliance private raised some questions in his mind.</p>
<p>&#8220;What the industry loses, of course, is transparency,&#8221; Maloney said.</p>
<p>The sale also closely follows a decision last month by Tralliance to initiate so-called bulk sales of dot-travel domain names at discount prices. Under the new sales plan, Cespedes said, anyone buying 25,000 or more names will get a rebate.</p>
<p>But so far, just one such sale has been acknowledged by the company: the purchase of 200,000 destination and service-oriented domain names by Egan and Cespedes themselves.</p>
<p>Cespedes confirmed last week that he and Egan had created a new enterprise named LabiGroup, which in turn acquired 200,000 names to help build working destinations. The dot-travel top-level domain has struggled to find buyers willing to actually build dot-travel Web sites and use them for travel-related businesses. Until the LabiGroup purchase, only about 30,000 names had been sold, and most of them have not been used.</p>
<p>&#8220;Rather than keep talking about it, we said, &#8216;We&#8217;ll put a bulk purchase program in place and talk to guys who will commit money, real money, to dot-travel,&#8217; &#8221; Cespedes said. &#8220;So we are leading by example. We are putting up sites around destinations, around services and around things that we believe people are interested in concerning travel, so that when the millions of people who type in dot-travel every month &#8212; some 8 to 10 million are doing so &#8212; they will find something they&#8217;re looking for.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cespedes would not disclose how much LabiGroup paid for those 200,000 names, but even when allowing for pricing discounts, the purchase would have required an estimated $2 million investment. </p>
<p>The sales agreement values Tralliance at $7.3 million.</p>
<p>Benefits to new ownership</p>
<p>Cespedes told Travel Weekly that the new ownership would be invisible to buyers and owners of dot-travel domain names. He said it would reduce fixed costs for Tralliance as it redoubles efforts to raise the profile of the struggling domain-name business and boosts participation in dot-travel within the global travel industry.</p>
<p>Cespedes said the sale would not bring changes to management, policies or to Tralliance&#8217;s relationship to TTPC, which was established when the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, better known as ICANN, approved the domain three years ago.</p>
<p>Because TheGlobe.com is publicly traded, Cespedes said he could not comment on details of the transaction beyond what was revealed in the public announcement. But he said TheGlobe.com would offer more details in a regulatory filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission this week.</p>
<p>Terms of the transaction that have been disclosed call for Egan and business affiliates that have invested in Tralliance, primarily other Egan-controlled entities, to waive their interest in convertible promissory notes worth about $4.7 million as well as other fees and debt totaling about $6 million.</p>
<p>An earn-out provision, based on the performance of Tralliance after the sale, could add another $1.3 million to the deal. TheGlobe also will issue 269 million shares of common stock to the Registry Management Co., the company noted.</p>
<p>Cespedes said that under new policies recently approved by TTPC, he and Egan, like other purchasers of dot-travel domain names, have 60 days following the purchase of a dot-travel domain name to open a working Web site for each name.</p>
<p>He said LabiGroup had used a computer program to pick potential names and had then eyeballed each name (e.g. Mississippi.travel, SpringBreak.travel and SpringBreakHotel.travel) to ensure that they were not too long, made sense and were likely to attract travel shoppers.</p>
<p>Meeting the deadline for getting Web sites up and running for each of those 200,000 domain names presents a significant challenge, Cespedes said.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not only a lot to do but exceptionally expensive,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We have to build the sites. That takes time and more money. It is a big risk and a big investment, but we&#8217;re willing to make it, as we always have been.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the end, Cespedes said, there is still a lot of room for bulk and individual sales.</p>
<p>Cespedes said Tralliance was planning a marketing campaign later this year that would include magazine and television advertising.</p>
<p>He said the company had also hired a public relations expert to help raise the profile of the dot-travel domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
